Responding to an office action requires a detailed and strategic approach. Here are the key steps:
1. Review the Objections: Carefully read through the examiner's objections to understand the issues fully.
2. Amend Claims: Modify the claims to address the objections. For instance, specify the unique features of your catalytic process or material that distinguish it from the cited prior art.
3. Provide Arguments: Offer detailed arguments to counter the examiner's objections. This could include explaining why your invention is not obvious or how it differs from prior art.
4. Submit Evidence: If necessary, submit additional experimental data or references to support your arguments. This can be particularly useful for demonstrating the utility or novelty of your catalyst.
